Scenario 1: Collaboration = Harassment?
A student is using Google Drive as a writing and
collaborative tool for peer reviewing. Juan and Jeremy have used the platform
instead to exchange comments that involve name-calling and racial slurs.
Jeremy’s parents object when his account is suspended claiming it will
negatively impact his academic progress.
Ethical issues: This
is clearly bullying and harassment, and improper use of technology. The
ethical issues reside clearly with the students involved and their behavior.
However, there is also an ethical issue with the teacher: was an
acceptable use policy explained, clearly outlined and signed? If nothing
was done along these lines by the teacher, then the parents have a legitimate
concern (though not argued well -- the boys can still make academic progress).
If the teacher took these measures, then I would explain to the parents
that the boys are receiving appropriate consequences for their actions.
And I would further argue that the academic objectives will still be met
with paper and pencil in a more old-fashioned method despite the suspension of
the boys' accounts.
Safety or
well-being of anyone in jeopardy: The bullying/harassment is the key
component to be addressed by the teacher -- immediately. Diversity sensitivity
lessons and empathy training would be paramount for me to teach and reteach.
Advice, strategy, or policy recommendation to individuals
or schools: The key issue, with regard to the parents' concerns, is that
students have initial lessons on Acceptable Use. Clear consequences would
need to be stated. I would role-play various scenarios that are similar
on the playground to how it would look with technology. I would also
communicate the Acceptable Use policy and consequences to parents in advance.
Real-life incidents or personal connections related to the
scenario: Because I taught 1st grade the last 3 years, we didn't have as
many opportunities for students to get involved in these kinds of risky
behaviors. However, I did have iPads, and had one student who would try
to hide and go to apps I hadn't assigned. I had him always sitting in a
place where I could see his screen; if/when he strayed, he lost
the privilege the next time we used iPads.
Scenario 6: Course Management Overload
Ms. Carlson is excited to use Edmodo, a course management
system similar to Moodle with her students. Although Edmodo isn’t
officially supported by the tech department like Moodle is, she is excited to
use it because she finds it much more intuitive to use and she likes the
interface better than Moodle. Ms. Carlson is vigilant about the
privacy settings, has informed her principal and parents of her instructional
goals and objectives. Her students jump on board and post to the discussion at
record numbers. Ms. Carlson is pleased to see such motivated dialogue on a
novel that had previously felt like pulling teeth. Two weeks into
the unit, she receives a parent complaint. The complaint is as follows:
Dear Ms. Carlson, Mr. Miller, Mr. Hamilton and Ms. McIntyre,
Although my son is a motivated and active participant in all of your classes, I
am concerned that the school does not seem to have a unified course management
system. He is using Moodle in Math, Edmodo in English, Schoology in Science,
and Kidblog in Social Studies. Furthermore, all of these sites require
different logins and passwords. As a parent, I am having a difficult time
keeping this all straight and am requesting that the school discuss this issue
and figure out a more streamlined approach.
Thank you for your consideration,
A supportive but confused parent
Ethical issues: I
don't see a lot of ethical issues. I suppose going away from the
district's supported platform could be considered somewhat controversial, but
it's not wrong. There could be an ethical issue with regard to the parent
being a helicopter parent and not letting the student deal with the reality of
a variety of sites and passwords.
Safety or
well-being of anyone in jeopardy: The biggest issue here seems to be the
parent and his/her helicoptering. Students are much more adept than
adults at adapting to new platforms and technologies. At a younger
elementary age, accessing all of these platforms and remembering all of these
passwords might be too taxing, but I don't see that happening in the real
world.
Advice, strategy, or policy recommendation to individuals
or schools: Because of the parent's concern (and massive "To"
list), the issue must be addressed. It would probably need to be
addressed at a higher level: what is the district's policy with regard to
unsupported platforms? If they want to make clear black & white
lines about what can/cannot be used, then the district would be limiting the
capabilities of teachers and backing themselves into a corner for future
technological breakthroughs by imposing evaluations/wait time/studies etc.
Technology changes so rapidly that I think we don't want to set those
kinds of limitations. On the flip side, we can be proactive as a
district and provide online tutorials for using these platforms. If a
teacher strays from district-supported platforms, perhaps it should be
mandatory that he/she provide such a tutorial on his/her website.
Real-life incidents or personal connections related to the
scenario: Again, coming from 1st grade, I don't have any personal
connections from school that relate to this scenario. However, I do
empathize with the parent's concern about remembering a bunch of passwords; it
is hard. At the same time, this is the world in which we live and we have
to find ways to teach the students and their parents tools to manage their
sites and passwords.